首页> 外文OA文献 >An assessment of the measurement of the Lense-Thirring effect in the Earth gravity field, in reply to: ``On the measurement of the Lense-Thirring effect using the nodes of the LAGEOS satellites, in reply to ``On the reliability of the so far performed tests for measuring the Lense-Thirring effect with the LAGEOS satellites'' by L. Iorio,'' by I. Ciufolini and E. Pavlis
【2h】

An assessment of the measurement of the Lense-Thirring effect in the Earth gravity field, in reply to: ``On the measurement of the Lense-Thirring effect using the nodes of the LAGEOS satellites, in reply to ``On the reliability of the so far performed tests for measuring the Lense-Thirring effect with the LAGEOS satellites'' by L. Iorio,'' by I. Ciufolini and E. Pavlis

机译:评估在地球重力场中的Lense-Thirring效应的评估,答复是:``关于使用LAGEOS卫星的节点进行Lense-Thirring效应的测量,响应``关于到目前为止,进行了使用LAGEOS卫星测量Lense-Thirring效果的测试,该测试由L. Iorio制作,I。Ciufolini和E. Pavlis制作。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In this paper we reply to recent claims by Ciufolini and Pavlis about certain aspects of the measurement of the general relativistic Lense-Thirring effect in the gravitational field of the Earth. I) The proposal by such authors of using the existing satellites endowed with some active mechanism of compensation of the non-gravitational perturbations as an alternative strategy to improve the currently ongoing Lense-Thirring tests is unfeasible because of the impact of the uncancelled even zonal harmonics of the geopotential and of some time-dependent tidal perturbations. II) It is shown that their criticisms about the possibility of using the existing altimeter Jason-1 and laser-ranged Ajisai satellites are groundless.III) Ciufolini and Pavlis also claimed that we would have explicitly proposed to use the mean anomaly of the LAGEOS satellites in order to improve the accuracy of the Lense-Thirrring tests. We prove that it is false. In regard to the mean anomaly of the LAGEOS satellites, Ciufolini himself did use such an orbital element in some previously published tests. About the latest test performed with the LAGEOS satellites, IV) we discuss the cross-coupling between the inclination errors and the first even zonal harmonic as another possible source of systematic error affecting it with an additional 9% bias. V) Finally, we stress the weak points of the claims about the origin of the two-nodes LAGEOS-LAGEOS II combination used in that test.
机译:在本文中,我们回应了Ciufolini和Pavlis最近关于地球引力场中相对论Lense-Thirring效应测量的某些方面的主张。 I)此类作者提出的使用具有一些主动补偿非重力扰动机制的现有卫星作为改进当前正在进行的Lense-Thirring测试的替代策略的提议是不可行的,因为未消除的偶数纬向谐波会产生影响势和一些随时间变化的潮汐扰动。 II)表明他们对使用现有高度计Jason-1和激光测距的Ajisai卫星的可能性的批评是毫无根据的。III)Ciufolini和Pavlis还声称我们将明确建议使用LAGEOS卫星的均值异常为了提高Lense-Thirrring测试的准确性。我们证明这是错误的。关于LAGEOS卫星的平均异常,Ciufolini本人确实在一些先前发表的测试中使用了这种轨道要素。关于使用LAGEOS卫星进行的最新测试,IV),我们讨论了倾角误差和一次均匀纬向谐波之间的交叉耦合,这是另一个可能造成系统误差并造成9%偏差的系统误差来源。 V)最后,我们强调关于该测试中使用的两节点LAGEOS-LAGEOS II组合的起源的主张的弱点。

著录项

  • 作者

    Iorio, L;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2006
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号